![]() Predict depth from an image sequence or a video with pre-trained Monodepth2 models 03. Predict depth from a single image with pre-trained Monodepth2 models 02. 1 BENCHMARK Virtual KITTIThis dataset contains aligned image and range data: Make3D Image and Laser Depthmap Image and Laser and Stereo Image and 1D Laser Image and Depth for Objects Video and Depth (coming soon) Different types of examples are there-outdoor scenes (about 1000), indoor (about 50), synthetic objects (about 7000), etc.The RGB images have high resolution, while the depth maps are provided at low resolution. depth camera color image dataset by Make3D dataset is a monocular Depth Estimation dataset that contains 400 single training RGB and depth map pairs, and 134 test samples. Once we understood what was going on and reconfigured the LAG, everything worked great on all platforms.54 open source pig-detection images. It was not responding with the appropriate verbs. Once we understood what was going on and reconfigured the LAG, everything worked great on all platforms. This stupid server was configured to respond to the OPTIONS request rather than passing it along to IIS. Please note that this only came up because the traffic was going through a Novell LAG Reverse Proxy server. In my original post - hopefully it will help someone else out there someday. ![]() This is the information I was looking for It issues a PROPFIND and a LOCK even though it's not returned in the OPTIONS request, and of course, that happens to work fine in my particular situation. That it ignores the options that are returned. XP on the other hand is perhaps less of a good citizen, in It behaves nicely and just does a GET, giving you a read-only local copy of the file. #Win 7 webdav client windows 7#PROPFIND and LOCK, then the Windows 7 WebClient will not issue those subsequent verbs in a request. However, if the response does not include So, why was the behavior different? Because both WebClients issue an OPTIONS request to start with. So, we were not doing explorer-based file mapping. The document was opened from within Word (or by launching winword.exe That said, through the use of Fiddler2, the log files, and wireshark, it was pretty straightforward to figure out what was going on.īasically, my situation was that I could open a document read-write from XP yet the same document/URL would open read-only under Windows 7. My theory was that there was a difference based on the observable different behavior on Unfortunately that wasn't exactly what I was after - I was looking for how the WebClient behavior was different between platforms. This seems completely wrong.Īll that to say, can anybody explain the differences between the WebClient logic on these different platforms? ![]() The Win 7 WebClient will do the PROPFIND on the / directory rather than in the /webdav/ directory. But in reality, if you dig deeper, you'll see that there are a few PROPFIND verbs being issued, but they're issued to the server root! The lack of a lock results in read-only mode, but the client redirector never requested a lock. There is no PROPFIND or LOCK prior to the GET. The verbs issued by the Windows 7 WebDAV client redirector appear to only be GET verbs. Documents will only open in read-only mode. Windows 7 clients however cannot connect to our WebDAV server in read-write mode. ![]() When Windows XP clients connect to our WebDAV server, they issue a PROPFIND, LOCK, then GET verb. I'm curious if anybody has any detailed knowledge about the WebDAV client redirector on Windows 7. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |